Whole Foods Market, Inc. is headed by its CEO John Mackey, who publicly disclosed his position on healthcare. Because of this, the company could suffer the consequences of such disclosure. Should John Mackey be allowed to remain as CEO of Whole Foods? Are his actions in the best interest of the company?
John R. Wells; Travis Haglock
Harvard Business Review (705476-PDF-ENG)
June 09, 2005
Case questions answered:
- What obligation does a company’s leadership have to refrain from taking a public opinion on a potentially contentious topic?
- Should John Mackey have made himself available in the weeks following the publication of his op-ed?
- Was Whole Foods Market, Inc.’s response to the social media attacks appropriate? What would have been an appropriate response?
- Should a basic understanding of a company’s customer base dictate which opinions should be shared and which should not?
- Should John Mackey be allowed to remain as president, CEO, and chairman of the board at Whole Foods? Are his actions in the best interest of his shareholders and stakeholders?
Not the questions you were looking for? Submit your questions & get answers.
Case answers for Whole Foods Market, Inc.
1. What obligation does a company’s leadership have to refrain from taking a public opinion on a potentially contentious topic?
Every company, including Whole Foods Market, Inc., has certain limits for themselves. The leadership of a company can make decisions that pertain to the company by seeking public opinions and at the same time, they can make decisions without involving public opinion. However, if that involves a potentially controversial topic, then the company should take the responsibility of making the right decision and must ensure that they make the decision as an organization without seeking public opinion.
It is essential to note that public opinions do vary because every person will tend to have a different view and opinion towards the topic in question. Therefore, if the company’s leadership wants to consider public opinion, they should do so on a general topic but not a contentious one. Taking a public topic on such a topic will not improve the situation but rather make matters even worse because the different opinions provided by the public can cause confusion and defamation.
In this case, it is evident that the media was looking for something to cause drama, and Whole Foods Market Inc.’s CEO, John Mackay, gave them exactly that. He was a popular figure in the media. He publicly announced his position on healthcare and because of this, his business could suffer the consequences of the comments. Around half of the comments regarding Whole Foods became negative because of the statements of John Mackay. Some of the customers even vowed not to shop with Whole Foods again. This can potentially affect the sales of the company. This explains the reason why the company’s leadership should refrain from seeking public opinion on such contentious topics. At times, their opinions can affect the business.
It is normally important to assess the depth of the situation before considering whether to involve public opinion. Any topic that is taken for public opinion becomes a contentious one; therefore, the company’s leadership should avoid taking public opinion on critical matters unless it is necessary. But it is essential to consider limited opinion from limited people to avoid making a topic a contentious one.
2. Should John Mackey have made himself available in the weeks following the publication of his op-ed?
Yes, I believe John Mackey should have made himself available. He is the CEO of Whole Foods Market, Inc. and should take responsibility for his actions. He caused a lot of drama for himself and the Whole Foods Company and rather than trying to avoid publicity and media by keeping away, he ought to have come out and explained himself.
He ought to have been brave enough to face the result of his actions. Such a move could have saved Whole Foods from losing customers and experiencing reduced sales. Sometimes, the strategy of laying low and letting the situation die naturally can work but this was at the expense of the company growth and continuity.
3. Was Whole Foods Market, Inc.’s response to the social media attacks appropriate? What would have been an appropriate response?
I think the social media response of Whole Foods Market, Inc. was basically…