Get Full Access to this Case Solution NowUnlock Case Solution
The NutraSweet Co. has established its name in the business of artificial, non-saccharide sweetener around the world. Its patents for its products have been protected until 1987 in some countries and until 1992 in the United States. On the other hand, Holland Sweetener Company (HSC) entered into the same business in 1987. This Bitter Competition: The Holland Sweetener Co. vs. NutraSweet (A) case study describes each company's game theory.
Adam Brandenburger; Maryellen Costello; Julia Kou
Harvard Business Review (794079-HCB-ENG)
December 28, 1993
Case questions answered:
- Case study write-up, analysis, and strategic recommendations.
- Game theory and price war strategy.
Not the questions you were looking for? Submit your own questions & get answers.
Bitter Competition: The Holland Sweetener Co. vs. NutraSweet (A) Case Answers
Memo – To Winfried Vermijs (January 31, 1986)
Executive Summary – The Holland Sweetener Co.
The single most important problem faced by the Holland Sweetener Company (HSC) as it decided to enter the European and Canadian aspartame market is how NutraSweet is going to respond. The primary cause of this problem is that the dominant incumbent, NutraSweet, can either enter a price war with HSC or accommodate to compete normally and NutraSweet’s reaction will affect HSC’s profitability.
To address this problem, HSC should analyze the pros and cons of each scenario for NutraSweet, decide on which scenario is more likely to happen, and plan the course of action accordingly.
Our analysis shows that NutraSweet is more likely to enter a price war with HSC. HSC should leverage the less costly and more flexible production method to keep costs low, go after customers who are unhappy with NutraSweet’s restrictive contracts, stress its European origin to market to the European market, and seek out opportunities for blending with other artificial sweeteners as this trend is expected to strengthen.
The most important problem facing the Holland Sweetener Company is to assess the likelihood of a normal competition versus a price war. This is the most important problem because the price and volume forecasts under these two scenarios are different, leading to different profitability.
The primary actionable cause of this problem is…
Unlock Case Solution Now!
Get instant access to this case solution with a simple, one-time payment ($24.90).
- You'll be redirected to the full case solution.
- You will receive an access link to the solution via email.
Best decision to get my homework done faster!
MBA student, Boston